In a surprise move by Region 19, the NLRB has decided that Section 17.15, which requires the grievance procedures of the agreement be exhausted before utilizing “other remedies,” is unlawful and in violation of the ACT.
Region 19 found merit to the original charge against Rich Austin and Local 19 and asked if I would be agreeable to amending it to include the International. They also asked if I would be agreeable to filing an additional charge against PMA, as they would be needed in order to make the needed changes to the PCLCD. I said yes, and here they are;
For the last 36 years I have watched the Union deny workers their right to go to the NLRB, by requiring them to exhaust the PCLCD grievance machinery before going to the “outside.”
The grievance process is designed to take 6 months on every complaint filed by workers, so that when they get denied and go to the NLRB they will be time barred by Section 10 (b) of the Act.
The Union knows that Section 10 (b) of the Act is strictly enforced, which is exactly why they take at least 6 months to process any grievances against the Union.
The “unfair” language of PCLCD Section 17.15 is nothing compared to the fraud and interference going on with the PCLCD Section 13 discrimination procedures.
If you have been denied access to PCLCD Section 13, either 13.2 or 13.3, and you want to do something about it please contact me at [email protected], or the Jennifer Duffy at [email protected] at the law firm below.
Law Offices of Jennifer Duffy
28649 S. Western Avenue Suite 6571
Los Angles, CA 90734
310-714-9779
It is time for a Class Action.
The current leadership of the ILWU seems to have forgotten that; An injury to one is an injury to all.
It only takes 3 workers to form a Class.
Are there 3 workers out there interested in stepping up?
With increased use of robots on the docks, there will be fewer longshoremen needed.
With increased use of transponders and electronic information platforms, there will be zero clerks needed.
If the ILWU gives the Employers another 5 years before they go back to the bargaining table, when they get there there will be nothing left for them to bargain for, and no need for registering any more longshoremen because casuals will do and they have no benefits.
Bobby O Jr. is running up and down the Coast telling Locals that the robots have eliminated hundreds of jobs in LA/LB.
Bobby O Jr. has negotiated 2 robot Agreements that eliminated around 140 jobs per ship visit, and he refuses to provide his membership copies of the Agreements that they ratified.
Friday afternoon, PMA finally sent a written proposal to the Union and it includes some money, along with the pension increase.
Will the ILWU sell out their future for a few cents and some retirement money?
How is Big Baby going to sell this to his members?
If the ILWU agrees to extend the Contract, it will be the beginning of the end of a great Union.
It seems like PMA’s interest for negotiating a 3 year extension poofed away when “The Donald” won the election.
The lack of interest is reflected in their 1 item, unwritten,”take it or leave it,” offer to raise the retirement pay to $225 for each good year in 2022.
That’s it, no wages, keep everything else as is, including the medical benefits plan, and increase the retirement to $225 by 2022.
Does Big Baby Bob think that he can convince his greedy membership that they will not be able to get anything at the bargaining table in 2019?
Does Big Baby think that one of his temper tantrums including storming off the stage, to go sit in the back and pout, will somehow persuade his members to give him his big fat retirement gift?
Beating up on individuals like David Miller and Eric Aldape may scare his members, but it does not faze the Employers.
Big Baby is losing it and his rants, like the one he threw yesterday at the CLRC meeting, are not going to work.
Try and bluff and deceive your way out of this Big Baby.
It ain’t going to work because, Homey Don’t Play That!
Big Baby Bob has backed off his position that all Arbitrators are barred from testifying in grievance hearings.
At the CLRC meeting today at PMA, Big Baby plans to present his new proposal that only former Arbitrators be barred from participation as witnesses.
How about only barring those Arbitrators that Big Baby fired?
All this weird behavior by Big Baby makes me wonder, what is it exactly that David Miller has on Big Baby?
Could it be that “Judge Roy Bean” Miller knows where all Big Baby Bob’s skeletons are buried?
Or, is this a power play to show the Caucus that Big Baby is large and in charge?
Next week Big Baby will be trying to “sell” PMA’s proposal to extend the contract.
Big Baby will be trying to sell an extension that only gives money to the retirees, and he will be doing his “thing” in order to force his members to do what he wants.
Does anyone else find it interesting that the only beneficiaries of the extension will be the retirees, and Big Baby will be retiring with the maximum 37 years right after the extension is ratified?
Come on Big Baby, do you really think you can bluff and deceive your membership into buying your retirement package?
Big Bob got wind that David Miller, the Arbitrator he fired during the 2014 Contract negotiations, was going to be called as a witness in 2 Arbitration hearings and he went nuts.
For along time, I have had the feeling that Big Bob has been interfering in the Section 13 Arbitration process, especially since he hired ILWU Attorney for the last 30 years, Larry Schwerin, as the Coast Appeals Officer. The April 13th letter that he and his Coast Committee sent to PMA, including the PMA Sub-Steering Committee, provides proof.
Big Bob’s letter is almost entirely composed of fabricated nonsense and outright lies.
Last week, PMA brought in former Southern California Area Arbitrator, David Miller, as an expert witness. About 40 minutes into the hearing Local 34 called for a caucus, then after about 30 minutes came back into the hearing, with 2 goons, and told David he had to go, that he was trespassing, and 911 would be called if he did not leave immediately.
Big Bob’s April 13th letter makes it clear that he is the one objecting to David Miller’s participation, not Local 34.
Big Bob is attempting to bully his way into getting David removed as a witness, the same way he got David fired in 2014, using his bully boy intimidation tactics and flat out lies. Bob and the Coast Committee are outright witness tampering.
The only true statement in Big Bob’s April 13th letter is that; “Mr. Miller served for many years as an area arbitrator for Southern California.”
It is NOT “inherently improper and unfair for one party to use a former arbitrator in this manner,” and “Use of a former arbitrator in this manner undermines the integrity of the arbitration system as well as the integrity of the arbitrators,” is a bold faced lie and unsupported by any documentation.
There are no CLRC minutes, or any JCLRC Clarifications, that say former Arbitrators cannot participate in Arbitrations, and the JCLRC Clarifications on Arbitration Procedures state; “The Committee recognizes that the parties, both local and coast, have not and do not wish to be bound by rigid formal Arbitration procedures.”
In fact, according to Arbitration Award SCAA-0032-2009, the Local 13 used Coast Appeals Officer/Arbitrator Rudy Rubio as a witness and Big Bob had no problem. Could that be because Rudy was going to say exactly what Big Bob wanted him to say?
According to the Bible of Arbitration, How Arbitration Works by Elkouri and Elkouri, there is nothing what-so-ever wrong with using a former Arbitrator as an Expert Witness.
According to How Arbitration Works; “The “expert” is allowed to draw inferences and conclusions because, in theory, his knowledge is superior to that of the person having to resolve the issue, be it judge, jury, or arbitrator,” and “In addition to the admission of opinion evidence by expert witnesses (generally admitted by courts of law), it is suggested that arbitrators may in their discretion admit any opinion testimony from knowledgeable persons if such testimony might be helpful.”
“Arbitrators should be informed as fully as possible about the disputes they are to resolve. Accordingly, the arbitrator must feel free to participate personally in the hearing by asking questions, seeking information, and exploring all angles to the extent reasonably necessary to satisfy himself that he has in fact been informed as fully as possible.”
Big Bob’s interference in the process by telling the Arbitrators that they cannot hear from witnesses, unless he says so, is illegal and unethical and someone needs to tell him so.
Big Bob’s argument that Arbitrators can be “bought” by a party to endorse and promote its arbitration positions is not just speculation. Bob “bought” 30 year Union Attorney, Larry Schwerin, as Coast Appeals Officer.
According to the following Letter of Understanding dated July 1, 2014, the Parties agreed to appoint an “individual from outside the industry to serve as the Coast Appeals Officer under the Section 13.2 procedures.”
Larry Schwerin is NOT from outside the industry. Larry Schwerin’s law firm has and still does represent ILWU Locals 19 and 23.
Larry Schwerin does exactly what Big Bob tells him to do, because he has made millions of dollars from the ILWU and he does not want to lose his cash cow.
Contrary to Big Bob’s false claim, David Miller did NOT sue the ILWU to undo the current arbitration system, he sued for defamation and back pay. Read the David Miller – Lawsuit Statement of Facts for yourself.
Bold faced lies and whining and crying are Big Bob’s standard negotiation tactics, and that is exactly what he is doing with his letter to PMA.
David Miller’s presence as an expert witness was in no way a provocation or an intended offense against the Union, and sends no message that the Employers can; “unfairly manipulate the arbitration system by hiring a former arbitrator as a ‘ringer,'” that is just Big Bob whining and crying.
Big Bob’s letter proves that he is interfering in the Section 13 Arbitration system as well.
Bob claims it “came to our attention” that; “one of the parties” had cited David Miller as a witness in a Section 13.2 hearing (SPSC-0006-2017).
How did it “come to our attention?” Was it a result of the Special LRC called by Local 13 to complain about David Miller being listed as a witness?
What does Big Bob mean when he says; “We understand that Mr. Miller is not a percipient witness and instead is being called to testify with respect to his prior role as an area arbitrator under the PCL&CA?”
How could Big Bob possibly understand what a witness is going to testify to if he never talked to either the witness or the charged party’s representative?
The parties DO NOT have an established policy against allowing testimony by a PCL&CA arbitrator in any proceeding. If they did, then how did Rudy Rubio testify in SCAA-0032-2009?
Big Bob is NOT a lawyer, and “the coast” has not and does not wish to be bound by rigid formal Arbitration procedures, so why is he misquoting the law? More deception and bluff?
This is NOT a law suit and nothing bars David Miller from being called as a witness, in any grievance hearing, period.
Someone needs to tell Big Bob that he is not the biggest kid in the sandbox and whining and crying and lying, will NOT get him his way.
Oh, and thanks for the letter Big Bob, I will be using it with my NLRB charges regarding Section 13 and a longshoreman doing time off over a political cartoon.
Not only did Local 23 refuse to provide JPLRC minutes in violation of a previous Settlement Agreement, Local 23 got called out for having different penalties for members from other Locals.
All users of the Dispatch Hall (including casuals) are entitled to JPLRC minutes, all they need to do is ask. There are no secrets on the waterfront.
Local 23’s explanation for putting members on 6 months no travel to Tacoma, instead of the $50 fine they charge their members, is that they have no way of getting a hold of Voluntary Travelers to collect the fine.
Right, no way to get a hold of a Registered member of a sister ILWU Local.
PMA knows exactly how to get a hold of every longshoreman. Nice try boys.
Yesterday Region 19 found merit to another NLRB charge, against Local 19 this time, and asked if I would be agreeable to filing additional charges against the International and PMA, related to the requirement that the PCLCD grievance machinery be exhausted prior to filing NLRB charges.
Thanks Rich and Dean, you have given us the opportunity to make changes in the PCLCD grievance procedure and shown us your true colors.
The once mighty ILWU, known for the solidarity of their “rank and file,” has become a pathetic bunch of greedy idiots run by closed groups on Facebook.
Each Local has a closed Facebook group that comprises over 10% of the total membership for the Local, which is known as a quorum.
Union meetings, both membership and Executive Board, require a quorum in order to conduct any business.
The Facebook groups go to the meetings, and the Facebook groups vote.
If you look at the numbers of voters in the run-off elections in LA/LB for example; just under 2200 of the 7000 members voted, and 2894 members are in the Local 13 Facebook closed group. Local 13 2017 spring run off final results
What does that say?
It says the ILWU is run by the Facebook clique.
At Local 19 and Local 23, the Facebook clique attends Union meetings and make changes to work rules, dispatch rules, and their constitution, because they constitute a quorum.
Check out the Facebook rants of Local 23 President Dean McGrath;
Dean refuses to provide JPLRC Minutes to members, in violation of a previous NLRB Settlement Agreement, and puts members from Local 19 on 6 months no-travel to Tacoma for something Local 23 members are fined $50, then quits the group because he does not want to talk about what he is doing, outside of his closed Facebook Group.
On March 23, 2017, Local 23 signed another NLRB Settlement Agreement which will be posted in the Local 23 Dispatch Hall and on Local 23’s Facebook page. Oh, and here as well, as soon as it is available.
Local 19 President, Rich Austin, is such a chicken shit and so afraid of Eric Aldape that on September 26, 2016, he canceled Karey’s Section 17.41 hearing, claiming Karey did not have the right to be represented by another A-registered longshoreman.
Both Rich and dip-shit Doug Stearns form PMA, both told Eric and Karey they would look into the matter of representation and get back to them.
In stead of doing that, Rich and his ball washing dispatchers decided to retaliate against Karey, and Darren Woeck filed a grievance against Karey, because Karey said he was going to file a 13.3 against Darren when he caught him putting names on the dispatch pads, again, prior to the start of dispatch on September 26, 2016, (The same day Rich pissed his pants.)
Karey will be filing another claim of discriminatory application of contract language in violation of Section 13.3 and of retaliation against him, because of his activity for or against the Union, because he filed complaints against the dispatchers for placing names on dispatch pads prior to the start of dispatch.
Processing a grievance filed against one employee by another employee, in this case a dispatcher, is a direct violation of the procedure agreed to in CLRC meeting #21-12, Item 3.
No employer complaint was filed against Karey within 30 days of the alleged violation, and he was not cited to appear by the JPLRC.
According to CLRC #21-12, item 3; “only the Employers have standing to file a complaint under Section 17.81,” which is the Section that should have been used to file the complaint.
Section 17.125 is a sub-section on Section 17.12: “The duties of the Joint Port Labor Relations Committee.”
When the JPLRC finishes an investigation, only the Employer has the standing to file a complaint under Section 17.81 and that did not happen.
Karey went to the JPLRC meeting on December 1, 2016, to discuss his Section 13.3 complaint against the dispatchers and get an answer to his requests for the 30-day rule for filing complaints in Seattle and to get an answer to his question related to representation at Section 17.41 hearings, as that is why his hearing on September 26, 2016, was canceled by Rich Austin.
Karey did not know the JPLRC was going to process the complaint filed by the dispatcher, in retaliation for his 13.3 complaint related to putting names on dispatch slips prior to the start of dispatch, as he had received no notice by the JPLRC.
Karey was asked who his witnesses were. He was a little stunned by the questions and while he was thinking of what he was going to say, Tom Clay from TTI blurted out, “We already know what you did.”
Karey thought Tom’s statement was odd, but he decided to answer, told the JPLRC who his witnesses were and left the meeting.
When Karey received the letter of warning dated February 24, 2016, he realized that the JPLRC found him guilty without ever talking to his witnesses, based on a grievance filed by another longshoreman in clear violation of CLRC #21-12, item 3, because of his activity for or against the Union.
Why does Rich, and the rest of the ILWU Officers including the Coast, want to keep the information related to grievance procedures and process in the CLRC minutes hidden from their members?
Are they that insecure and desperate to keep power that they won’t share information with their members?
Harry Bridges would never behaved like this, he kept no secrets and accepted all challengers. He would be flat out ashamed of the current leadership with their redacted minutes and lying Officials.
Why would Rich flat out lie to his member, and the NLRB, about the CLRC procedure that allows a longshoreman the ability to be represented by another Class A, or Class B, longshoreman or clerk?
Does Rich think he can lie his way out of this?
Homey don’t play that!
Homey says, Rich gets another smack with the NLRB sock.
